Comment 65 for bug 11674

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:43:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Josh Coalson <email address hidden>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <email address hidden>, Ralph Giles <email address hidden>
Cc: Matt Zimmerman <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: [Flac-dev] liboggflac1 soname

--- Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Ralph Giles wrote:
> > As such it's an incompatible change, for which you should also
> > zero the 'age' field. So 1.1.1-beta1 should have been 2:0:0,
> > not 2:0:1.
> [...]
> > Yes, I agree. The numbering is all about coexisting installs of the
>
> > various versions.
>
> Ok. I need to know what to do about this... is 1.1.2 with fixed
> sonames
> just around the corner? What should we do to fix sonames in Debian?

OK, I am going to do a 1.1.2 earlier than I wanted in order to
fix this. anyway there are some bug fixes and speedups that will
be of benefit.

because of the mess and since there have been API changes and
additions in both libFLAC and libOggFLAC since 1.1.1 I plan on
bumping all the libtool numbers as follows: current++, revision=0
age=0. if this will cause problems please let me know.

I'll try to get this ready as soon as possible.

Josh

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favorites on one personal page � Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com