Comment 8 for bug 89023

Revision history for this message
Stephen D Kamm (s-kamm) wrote :

OK, after "Complete Removal" and re-installation, I am in the same situation reported in my comment of 2007-03-02 02:51:13 UTC.

In other words, in my installation, 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.10-0ubuntu0.6.06.2 is, from the user's perspective, functionally the same as 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.10-0ubuntu0.6.06.1

Could there be a 64-bit issue left unpatched?