> Hmm, I think it should. See comment 22.
Huh. That's... odd. Really odd, since we're clearing the textruns as we reflow too, right?
> Well, that basically contradicts all that I know about textruns
Note that it's _possible_ I was getting hits on the textrun cache. Again, I was just looking at the constructor invocations.
> Hmm, I think it should. See comment 22.
Huh. That's... odd. Really odd, since we're clearing the textruns as we reflow too, right?
> Well, that basically contradicts all that I know about textruns
Note that it's _possible_ I was getting hits on the textrun cache. Again, I was just looking at the constructor invocations.