That wasn't my point at all, please re-read my comment.
> Hmm, yeah. Using an nsIURIContentListener may work better than a
> streamlistener in that it would prevent HTML content served up as a torrent
> from being rendered inline.
So an http://.../foo.torrent file would be downloaded, but a
moz-torrent:http://.../foo.torrent file would be rendered inline, right? That
seems to me to be what we want if we do this.
> I can see your point; why bit torrent?
That wasn't my point at all, please re-read my comment.
> Hmm, yeah. Using an nsIURIContentLi stener may work better than a
> streamlistener in that it would prevent HTML content served up as a torrent
> from being rendered inline.
So an http:// .../foo. torrent file would be downloaded, but a .../foo. torrent file would be rendered inline, right? That
moz-torrent:http://
seems to me to be what we want if we do this.