Hi, if I understand correctly, you're asking me to file a bug in file-roller. Unfortunately I don't know what "the FileChooser portal" is, nor do I know why it would be advantageous for file-roller to implement it. Now it could be that this actually *is* a Good Thing; but then I'm probably still not the one to file this bug. I simply cannot think of a reason to patch file-roller because Firefox Snap refuses to open certain files.
In a more general sense: if reading and/or writing files under $HOME/.cache/ is discouraged or otherwise undesirable, then that should be targeted - I'm guessing a whole lot of bugs must be filed then, but this very bug can be closed. However, if $HOME/.cache/ is the right place to cache these things, then Firefox Snap should be patched.
Hi, if I understand correctly, you're asking me to file a bug in file-roller. Unfortunately I don't know what "the FileChooser portal" is, nor do I know why it would be advantageous for file-roller to implement it. Now it could be that this actually *is* a Good Thing; but then I'm probably still not the one to file this bug. I simply cannot think of a reason to patch file-roller because Firefox Snap refuses to open certain files.
In a more general sense: if reading and/or writing files under $HOME/.cache/ is discouraged or otherwise undesirable, then that should be targeted - I'm guessing a whole lot of bugs must be filed then, but this very bug can be closed. However, if $HOME/.cache/ is the right place to cache these things, then Firefox Snap should be patched.