This is not the process for apt, apt-get, synaptic.
If user selects package via these then it should install a DEB based package.
If the USER selects to install via what ever programs/tools exist for snaps etc. then its should follow suit to respect that format and install a snap or what ever.
USER CHOICE SHOULD BE RESPECTED in apt/apt-get/syanptic to use DEB.
This is STEALTHY AND SNEAKS In a DIFFERING PACKAGE format via a DEB. Which is not correct, or warranted.
Tools should respect the packaging format that is being used via the tool being used, apt etc. means the user wants a DEB, not some other format.
This is not the process for apt, apt-get, synaptic.
If user selects package via these then it should install a DEB based package.
If the USER selects to install via what ever programs/tools exist for snaps etc. then its should follow suit to respect that format and install a snap or what ever.
USER CHOICE SHOULD BE RESPECTED in apt/apt- get/syanptic to use DEB.
This is STEALTHY AND SNEAKS In a DIFFERING PACKAGE format via a DEB. Which is not correct, or warranted.
Tools should respect the packaging format that is being used via the tool being used, apt etc. means the user wants a DEB, not some other format.
This is valid security violation.