Comment 51 for bug 1850529

Revision history for this message
In , Mh+mozilla (mh+mozilla) wrote :

(In reply to Nathan Froyd [:froydnj] from comment #19)
> (In reply to Mike Hommey [:glandium] (high latency) from comment #18)
> > It's very possible this is the same as bug 1601707. If it is, we don't need to exclude clang 6.
>
> OTOH, I don't want to be rediscovering that people are using a compiler that doesn't implement some finer point of C++17 (bug 1601707 comment 5) every couple of weeks or months, wasting time debugging, and rewriting the code to compensate.

That specific comment explicitly says current GCC doesn't implement it. Are we going to require clang only now?