Comment 47 for bug 1850529

(In reply to Nathan Froyd [:froydnj] from comment #19)
> (In reply to Mike Hommey [:glandium] (high latency) from comment #18)
> > It's very possible this is the same as bug 1601707. If it is, we don't need to exclude clang 6.
>
> OTOH, I don't want to be rediscovering that people are using a compiler that doesn't implement some finer point of C++17 (bug 1601707 comment 5) every couple of weeks or months, wasting time debugging, and rewriting the code to compensate.

I think we should have _some_ gcc build running tests on automation, fwiw. Finding stuff like that or bug 1600735 the hard way is really painful :(