© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
(In reply to :dmajor from comment #16)
> (In reply to Chris Manchester (:chmanchester) from comment #15)
> > I'll take this. dmajor, does it seem worthwhile to explicitly check for the clang 6 from automation case? Just disallowing clang-6 seems more straightforward.
>
> So you're proposing that our clang requirement on Linux would be "5 or later, but not 6"? I don't have any objection, but double check with froydnj.
Disallowing clang 6 entirely seems OK to me. Anybody who still has our automation-built clang 6 probably needs a kick to upgrade anyway. Please add a toolchain test to ensure that we detect clang 6 properly.