> I have found a workaround. The single `firejail` option that mitigates this behavior is `nodbus`. Any idea why disabling D-Bus access fixes this problem?
>
> This means that if you are affected by the problem you can run firefox like so:
> `firejail --noprofile --nodbus firefox`
> You can also edit the `firefox.desktop` file in `/usr/share/applications`. Of course, one can use firejail with its default firefox profile as it adds a nice layer of protection.
I do not understand this suggestion. firejail was not installed in my computer, and after installing, I get:
(In reply to jpegxguy from comment #56)
> I have found a workaround. The single `firejail` option that mitigates this behavior is `nodbus`. Any idea why disabling D-Bus access fixes this problem? applications` . Of course, one can use firejail with its default firefox profile as it adds a nice layer of protection.
>
> This means that if you are affected by the problem you can run firefox like so:
> `firejail --noprofile --nodbus firefox`
> You can also edit the `firefox.desktop` file in `/usr/share/
I do not understand this suggestion. firejail was not installed in my computer, and after installing, I get:
% firejail --noprofile --nodbus firefox
Error: invalid --nodbus command line option