This is fixed in Debian, why can't we apply the patch in Ubuntu?
@chrisccoulson, could you please provide some reasoning behind "This isn't something that we're going to be changing in Ubuntu"?
@bdrung, I have the following xul extensions installed:
xul-ext-adblock-plus 2.7.1+dfsg-1~ubuntu
xul-ext-ubufox 3.2-0ubuntu1
...why is xul-ext-ubufox trusted by firefox, while adblock isn't?
Does Canonical send <email address hidden> to be signed by Mozilla?
This is fixed in Debian, why can't we apply the patch in Ubuntu?
@chrisccoulson, could you please provide some reasoning behind "This isn't something that we're going to be changing in Ubuntu"?
@bdrung, I have the following xul extensions installed: adblock- plus 2.7.1+dfsg-1~ubuntu
xul-ext-
xul-ext-ubufox 3.2-0ubuntu1
...why is xul-ext-ubufox trusted by firefox, while adblock isn't?
Does Canonical send <email address hidden> to be signed by Mozilla?
Thanks!