Comment 87 for bug 402767

Hi Everyone,

I am sorry to hear about the problems that are occurring around this topic. I am conscious to see how we can drive towards a solution that can satisfy as many of the technical and policy issues that are being cited in this bug report. Many points have been raised throughout this conversation and while there is clearly passion in the air, I appreciate the constructive feedback that has been raised here. I would just ask that we focus our passion on solutions as opposed to tension.

I can assure you all there is no conspiracy, no cabal, no secret handshakes. The Canonical that has been a primary sponsor of the Ubuntu project is little different today as it was at the beginning of the project in terms of how it prioritizes and works with the community. While I am not expecting you to take my word for it, I would simply ask you to look at the history of Canonical's engagement with the Ubuntu project. Sure, there are bumps in the road, this is the nature of any project and company that has seen such extensive growth, but I think as a general rule of thumb, Canonical's engagement has been positive. What is important to me is that we continue to have a positive working relationship, and that we not only investigate areas of concern but also make adjustments and improvements where required.

In terms of this specific issue, I am checking in with our staff and the community to see how we can move this topic forward. Right now Alexander Sack is doing the same, and Rick Spencer is currently on vacation, so expect a bit of radio silence from him until he returns. I can assure you that this is very much on the radar. I appreciate everyone's patience on this.

  Jono