(In reply to comment #62) > Is this just backing out bug 481359 but adding ifdefs?
Yes, since it seems that bug 481359 happened just because the cursor on OS X is too bold and misleading.
> If so, I'd prefer a pref, not ifdefs.
Markus, can you do that?
(In reply to comment #62)
> Is this just backing out bug 481359 but adding ifdefs?
Yes, since it seems that bug 481359 happened just because the cursor on OS X is too bold and misleading.
> If so, I'd prefer a pref, not ifdefs.
Markus, can you do that?