(In reply to comment #59) > Nevermind on the second part of my comment, just noticed it already uses this > cursor.
In that case, "The cursor was removed because the cursor is meant to indicate that [...] the user can't interact with it" doesn't make sense.
(In reply to comment #59)
> Nevermind on the second part of my comment, just noticed it already uses this
> cursor.
In that case, "The cursor was removed because the cursor is meant to indicate that [...] the user can't interact with it" doesn't make sense.