(In reply to comment #59)
> My recommendation would be to defer this to 3.7, since we're giving the
> progress/activity a new treatment there. I don't think this is likely to make
> it for 3.6 at this point anyway?
This is now in bug 334697, and I don't see a reason why it shouldn't make 3.6.
(In reply to comment #59)
> My recommendation would be to defer this to 3.7, since we're giving the
> progress/activity a new treatment there. I don't think this is likely to make
> it for 3.6 at this point anyway?
This is now in bug 334697, and I don't see a reason why it shouldn't make 3.6.