Comment on attachment 325550 derivation from nss shutdown object, 2
(In reply to comment #86) > (From update of attachment 384744 [details]) > I'm assuming these two are obsolete...
No, it is not, I point out in comment 81 we should also take it.
Comment on attachment 325550
derivation from nss shutdown object, 2
(In reply to comment #86)
> (From update of attachment 384744 [details])
> I'm assuming these two are obsolete...
No, it is not, I point out in comment 81 we should also take it.