(In reply to comment #50)
> This looks like a dupe of bug 281480
That bug was opened in 2005, before the regression that caused this one. So the initial issue was probably something else. I've marked it as a duplicate of this one which contains more details.
(In reply to comment #50)
> This looks like a dupe of bug 281480
That bug was opened in 2005, before the regression that caused this one. So the initial issue was probably something else. I've marked it as a duplicate of this one which contains more details.
> and could it be related to bug 451457?
I don't think so, this one is related to imagelib but the <video> element does not use it.