If you had readed and understanded the suggested comments for bug 351186 you would know why there is no recommendation for the no-backfill patch.... Btw., the ubuntu version for catalyst is 10.4-666, the version of their website is 10.4-1. Guess why most people at fedora or arch or so use the ubuntu one ;-).
Second time: Nobody force you to use the fglrx nor backfill!
If you had readed and understanded the suggested comments for bug 351186 you would know why there is no recommendation for the no-backfill patch.... Btw., the ubuntu version for catalyst is 10.4-666, the version of their website is 10.4-1. Guess why most people at fedora or arch or so use the ubuntu one ;-).
Second time: Nobody force you to use the fglrx nor backfill!