Comment 296 for bug 351186

I agree that felix's patch is superior (apparently the empty buffer's
load faster than the ones containing random memory contents, besides
the already discussed security and aestethics aspects), but at least
for me, i'm experiencing memory leaks with both alternatives.

Incidentally, i seem to observe a higher memory leaking with newer X
versions as karmic release approaches than in jaunty or firts karmic
betas...

do you think that a memory usage test in a virual machine will do any
good? i can set up a couple of vms and leave them running to see
memory usage patterns...

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Daëavelwyn <email address hidden> wrote:
> On my dell studio xps 1640 with ati radeon 3670HD, the best patch is the
> feilx kueling 's one !! ;-)
> (thanks so much félix :) )
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:08 PM, AlexE <email address hidden> wrote:
>
>> On my machine, the better patch definitely is the one by Felix Kuehlig.
>> Works like a charm.
>>
>> --
>> [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects
>> enabled
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351186
>> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
>> of the bug.
>>
>
> --
> [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351186
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

--
entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem