Comment 21 for bug 284505

I think not, because the fglrx module seems loaded. Snip from dmesg;
dmesg | grep fglrx
[ 14.328262] fglrx: module license 'Proprietary. (C) 2002 - ATI Technologies, Starnberg, GERMANY' taints kernel.
[ 14.342900] [fglrx] Maximum main memory to use for locked dma buffers: 7758 MBytes.
[ 14.343291] [fglrx] vendor: 1002 device: 9501 count: 1
[ 14.343950] [fglrx] ioport: bar 4, base 0xbe00, size: 0x100
[ 14.345316] [fglrx] PAT is enabled successfully!
[ 14.358574] [fglrx] module loaded - fglrx 8.54.3 [Oct 10 2008] with 1 minors

And if the module was compiled against the wrong kernel it wouldn't get loaded...

I do however have some fglrx related files in lib - should I remove l-r-m for the 2.6.24 kernel? Even though I can't believe these would mess it up.

find /lib | grep fglrx
/lib/modules/2.6.24-21-generic/kernel/drivers/char/drm/fglrx.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.27-7-generic/updates/dkms/fglrx.ko
/lib/linux-restricted-modules/2.6.24-21-generic/fglrx
/lib/linux-restricted-modules/2.6.24-21-generic/fglrx/fglrx.mod.o
/lib/linux-restricted-modules/2.6.24-21-generic/fglrx/libfglrx_ip.a.GCC4
/lib/linux-restricted-modules/2.6.24-21-generic/fglrx/firegl_public.o