> added "ffmpeg-debian" as the bug is rather fixed there than in the
> "ffmpeg" source package. as this issue is now fixed in debian (thanx to
> all involved) it's now up to fix it in ubuntu too.
That would be me.
> for karmic this should be done with a debian import,
No, the new package needs to be merged properly. I see that I get to
that later this week
> but for jaunty we will need a SRU
> (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates). as it's a really safe
> small change in debian/control i don't think this should be a big
> deal,
I don't think that this is a so harmless as you claim. I really like to
have it tested in the wild before considering an SRU.
However feel free to work on that in a PPA.
And TBH, I don't understand all the fuzz people are making about
this. It really isn't so hard to remove the unstripped package before
building.
bojo42 <email address hidden> writes:
> added "ffmpeg-debian" as the bug is rather fixed there than in the
> "ffmpeg" source package. as this issue is now fixed in debian (thanx to
> all involved) it's now up to fix it in ubuntu too.
That would be me.
> for karmic this should be done with a debian import,
No, the new package needs to be merged properly. I see that I get to
that later this week
> but for jaunty we will need a SRU /wiki.ubuntu. com/StableRelea seUpdates). as it's a really safe
> (https:/
> small change in debian/control i don't think this should be a big
> deal,
I don't think that this is a so harmless as you claim. I really like to
have it tested in the wild before considering an SRU.
However feel free to work on that in a PPA.
And TBH, I don't understand all the fuzz people are making about
this. It really isn't so hard to remove the unstripped package before
building.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4