> And we have only one possibility: remove FAI source package or
> nothing...cause we don't remove single binary packages and fai-server
> is a result of the fai source package.
we'd need to change the fai source package.
> as we have tomorrow FF and I (nor siretart) don't find the time to
> upload at least a non working package to karmic, it's difficult.
that's correct :-(
> Thomas wants it to be removed, and I agree here for Karmic. We could,
> however, try to push some packages to FAIs uni-koeln.de archive some
> packages for ubuntu, marked as very,very experimental.
Stephan Hermann <email address hidden> writes:
> And we have only one possibility: remove FAI source package or
> nothing...cause we don't remove single binary packages and fai-server
> is a result of the fai source package.
we'd need to change the fai source package.
> as we have tomorrow FF and I (nor siretart) don't find the time to
> upload at least a non working package to karmic, it's difficult.
that's correct :-(
> Thomas wants it to be removed, and I agree here for Karmic. We could,
> however, try to push some packages to FAIs uni-koeln.de archive some
> packages for ubuntu, marked as very,very experimental.
This would be my preferred way to go.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4