On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Stephan Hermann<email address hidden> wrote:
> well,
>
> we discussed it with Thomas on #fai...
Well, some people have to work and cannot be always online.
It might be useful to discuss some trhings on a mailing list, so other
people can add their bits of opinions.
> And we have only one possibility: remove FAI source package or nothing...cause we don't remove single binary packages and fai-server is a result of the fai source package.
> as we have tomorrow FF and I (nor siretart) don't find the time to upload at least a non working package to karmic, it's difficult.
> Thomas wants it to be removed, and I agree here for Karmic
He might not be aware of the reasons I mentioned.
> PS: Or we discuss it on #fai@oftc right now :)
No access to the other world apart from mail right now :(
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Stephan Hermann<email address hidden> wrote:
> well,
>
> we discussed it with Thomas on #fai...
Well, some people have to work and cannot be always online.
It might be useful to discuss some trhings on a mailing list, so other
people can add their bits of opinions.
> And we have only one possibility: remove FAI source package or nothing...cause we don't remove single binary packages and fai-server is a result of the fai source package.
> as we have tomorrow FF and I (nor siretart) don't find the time to upload at least a non working package to karmic, it's difficult.
> Thomas wants it to be removed, and I agree here for Karmic
He might not be aware of the reasons I mentioned.
> PS: Or we discuss it on #fai@oftc right now :)
No access to the other world apart from mail right now :(
Henning
-- www.sprang. de
Henning Sprang
http://