On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 03:44:33PM -0000, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > @ubuntu-sru: May I know what is delaying the ack? The patch is known
> to work, the risks of regressions is zero (it's hard to regress
> something broken…). Too much time has been wasted already, so I intend
> to upload next weekend, with or without ack…
>
> You are working the wrong way around, you don't need an ack to upload,
> the sru team review things from the upload queue usually not from
> launchpad buglists
>
Aha, interesting, because my previous srus (even one last week) were
ack'd *before*…
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 03:44:33PM -0000, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > @ubuntu-sru: May I know what is delaying the ack? The patch is known
> to work, the risks of regressions is zero (it's hard to regress
> something broken…). Too much time has been wasted already, so I intend
> to upload next weekend, with or without ack…
>
> You are working the wrong way around, you don't need an ack to upload,
> the sru team review things from the upload queue usually not from
> launchpad buglists
>
Aha, interesting, because my previous srus (even one last week) were
ack'd *before*…
At least that's good to know, thanks.
-- /launchpad. net/~mrpouit
Lionel Le Folgoc - https:/
E61E 116D 4BA1 3936 0A33 F61D 65D9 A66E 10E2 969A