Comment 4 for bug 82515
Revision history for this message
| Fridtjof Busse (fbusse-deactivatedaccount-deactivatedaccount) wrote | #4 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
Sorry for forgetting to add the upstream bugid.
As hggdh's ssldump shows, Evolution uses weak ciphers by it's own choice.
I guess the upstream-reply is going to be "we do this for compatibility", but I don't see a single cipher that could be considered strong. Neither Blowfish nor Twofish or AES, this is really bad.