Comment 89 for bug 232340

Revision history for this message
In , Rouben (rouben) wrote :

Given the way this discussion is going, perhaps this indeed is an issue of
simply assigning a priority level to this bug that everyone can agree to and
just getting it done?

One thing that bugs me (no pun intended) is that this bug still has a "null"
priority level. I can certainly agree with the severity rating (this is indeed
an "enhancement"), but I certainly do not agree with the fact that this issue
has an undefined priority level. Do CACert reps really need to make a big fuss
out here in order for that rating to be changed (as was suggested in the
previous comment)?