Given the way this discussion is going, perhaps this indeed is an issue of
simply assigning a priority level to this bug that everyone can agree to and
just getting it done?
One thing that bugs me (no pun intended) is that this bug still has a "null"
priority level. I can certainly agree with the severity rating (this is indeed
an "enhancement"), but I certainly do not agree with the fact that this issue
has an undefined priority level. Do CACert reps really need to make a big fuss
out here in order for that rating to be changed (as was suggested in the
previous comment)?
Given the way this discussion is going, perhaps this indeed is an issue of
simply assigning a priority level to this bug that everyone can agree to and
just getting it done?
One thing that bugs me (no pun intended) is that this bug still has a "null"
priority level. I can certainly agree with the severity rating (this is indeed
an "enhancement"), but I certainly do not agree with the fact that this issue
has an undefined priority level. Do CACert reps really need to make a big fuss
out here in order for that rating to be changed (as was suggested in the
previous comment)?