Understood, but in the same spirit why should we trust the existing authorities that exist in mozilla/firefox in the first place?
Their commercial nature and methods of verificiation and authenticity aren't trustworthy as far as anyone here is conserned.
Did they pass a similar level of scrutiny? I don't believe so.
Or maybe we are forced to accept them because if we didn't then mozilla/firefox would be in a difficult position market-wise since most secure websites wouldn't work and thus make the browser seem incompatible to the user?
Understood, but in the same spirit why should we trust the existing authorities that exist in mozilla/firefox in the first place?
Their commercial nature and methods of verificiation and authenticity aren't trustworthy as far as anyone here is conserned.
Did they pass a similar level of scrutiny? I don't believe so.
Or maybe we are forced to accept them because if we didn't then mozilla/firefox would be in a difficult position market-wise since most secure websites wouldn't work and thus make the browser seem incompatible to the user?