This is weird indeed. Theoretically 2.12 should sport support for > 2G. I cannot test it myself (I run on x86_64 -- automagic support for large files --, and Evo 2.22). Upstream confirmed that there *is*, huh, should be, such support on 2.12.x.
If any of you on i386 are running Hardy Evo 2.22, and could test, I would appreciate.
Meanwhile... I am looking for the issue in the code.
@fgossart -- can you give us more details on what you did? You state you installed Evo on Windows. The link you provided is for an Evo 2.8 version -- so it is certain that there *was* already support at 2.8 for large files. Also, you state you create some archives. What did you archive, and were these archives used on your Linux?
@all: since when (version, if possible) have you been running Evo? Before 2.8? This might be related to previously created mailboxes (before >2G support), not newly created ones.
This is weird indeed. Theoretically 2.12 should sport support for > 2G. I cannot test it myself (I run on x86_64 -- automagic support for large files --, and Evo 2.22). Upstream confirmed that there *is*, huh, should be, such support on 2.12.x.
If any of you on i386 are running Hardy Evo 2.22, and could test, I would appreciate.
Meanwhile... I am looking for the issue in the code.
@fgossart -- can you give us more details on what you did? You state you installed Evo on Windows. The link you provided is for an Evo 2.8 version -- so it is certain that there *was* already support at 2.8 for large files. Also, you state you create some archives. What did you archive, and were these archives used on your Linux?
@all: since when (version, if possible) have you been running Evo? Before 2.8? This might be related to previously created mailboxes (before >2G support), not newly created ones.