On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 10:44 +0000, Fabien Tassin wrote:
> if you really think bzr is not to blame, then etckeeper should stop using bzr and move back to git like in debian.
> etckeeper needs to be able to handle anything in /etc, without LANG or anything in a user profile, it's a system tool.
I'm not arguing that this is not a bug in bzr; at the very least it
should give a better error message.
My question was about finding out whether or not this is is a bug that's
been present for a while or if it is a regression in oneiric.
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 10:44 +0000, Fabien Tassin wrote:
> if you really think bzr is not to blame, then etckeeper should stop using bzr and move back to git like in debian.
> etckeeper needs to be able to handle anything in /etc, without LANG or anything in a user profile, it's a system tool.
I'm not arguing that this is not a bug in bzr; at the very least it
should give a better error message.
My question was about finding out whether or not this is is a bug that's
been present for a while or if it is a regression in oneiric.
Cheers,
Jelmer