I think the bug status was changed automatically as the "Bug Watch Updater" does not appear to be a human ;-)
In any case this bug should be closed. The reason may be this: ejabberd does not have a dedicated maintainer in Ubuntu, and in Debian, where I maintain ejabberd package at present, I also would not introduce the change the bug poster proposed. At least not without having him presented a benchmark of "stock" vs "tweaked" versions of the same ejabberd release, captured for a typical workload.
I think the bug status was changed automatically as the "Bug Watch Updater" does not appear to be a human ;-)
In any case this bug should be closed. The reason may be this: ejabberd does not have a dedicated maintainer in Ubuntu, and in Debian, where I maintain ejabberd package at present, I also would not introduce the change the bug poster proposed. At least not without having him presented a benchmark of "stock" vs "tweaked" versions of the same ejabberd release, captured for a typical workload.