Ubuntu
eglibc package

  1. Bug #587186
  2. Comment #122

Comment 122 for bug 587186

Revision history for this message
In , Nick (nick-redhat-bugs) wrote :

(In reply to comment #43)
> (In reply to comment #42)
> > This is *not* a glibc bug.
>
> Andreas, can you be more specific? I'd like to get as many details as possible
> on this, so we can get it assigned to the proper component.

glibc should not contain NOPL instructions when compiled with -march=i686 against a recent binutils (GAS) version. A workaround in glibc should not be needed.

Refer to my previous comment.

Cheers,

Nick