(In reply to comment #42) > This is *not* a glibc bug.
Andreas, can you be more specific? I'd like to get as many details as possible on this, so we can get it assigned to the proper component.
(In reply to comment #42)
> This is *not* a glibc bug.
Andreas, can you be more specific? I'd like to get as many details as possible on this, so we can get it assigned to the proper component.