> Well, that's intriguing. I'll look into this (because I'm intrigued),
> but I'm declining the karmic nomination because the largest practical
> impact of the bug is the dmesg output itself - these dbus utilities
> represent an infinitesimal use of the system, if they run a little
> slower because of negative segments it's not going to significantly
> impact the instance performance.
I agree. I don't think its a big issue, the warning is just annoying. I
think in general, though, linking with rpath is not preferred, as, shown
here, it overrides system runtime settings.
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Well, that's intriguing. I'll look into this (because I'm intrigued),
> but I'm declining the karmic nomination because the largest practical
> impact of the bug is the dmesg output itself - these dbus utilities
> represent an infinitesimal use of the system, if they run a little
> slower because of negative segments it's not going to significantly
> impact the instance performance.
I agree. I don't think its a big issue, the warning is just annoying. I
think in general, though, linking with rpath is not preferred, as, shown
here, it overrides system runtime settings.