Comment 11 for bug 350089

Revision history for this message
Dustin Kirkland  (kirkland) wrote : Re: [Bug 350089] Re: package ecryptfs-utils 73-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

Ah, thanks for keeping up with this.

So I'm quite confident at this point that intrepid -> jaunty upgrades are safe.

I've tested this 4 different times now, server, desktop, alternate
installations, etc.

Toward the bottom of your dpkg log, I can see ecryptfs-utils being
'removed'. This should not happen automatically in any situation.
I've been trying to figure out if and how ecryptfs-utils might be
inadvertently removed, and I'm confident at this point that there's no
standard path to get this to happen.

Do you think it's possible that you might have flagged ecryptfs-utils
for removal at some point?

:-Dustin