You don't need to check with upstream e2fsprogs; I do keep an eye on Launchpad bugs.
None of UBSAN warnings are actually dangerous assuming sane[1] compilers and reasonable architecture. (e.g., a compiler that can correctly compile the Linux kernel and an architecture that run Linux should have no problems with e2fsprogs).
[1] "Any sufficiently advanced compiler is indistinguishable from a malicious adversary."
Still, it's better to fix these sorts of issues than not, so please see the attached patch. It will be included in the next release of e2fsprogs.
You don't need to check with upstream e2fsprogs; I do keep an eye on Launchpad bugs.
None of UBSAN warnings are actually dangerous assuming sane[1] compilers and reasonable architecture. (e.g., a compiler that can correctly compile the Linux kernel and an architecture that run Linux should have no problems with e2fsprogs).
[1] "Any sufficiently advanced compiler is indistinguishable from a malicious adversary."
Still, it's better to fix these sorts of issues than not, so please see the attached patch. It will be included in the next release of e2fsprogs.