Ted, thanks for your response, and sorry for the spam.
Can you just verify that this specific bit seems correct:
| On that derived image, I see 'resize2fs -P' numbers like:
| trusty: 274500
| utopic: 358400
| vivid: 358400
| The 83900 blocks out of a 358400 seems significant (23% of the fs size),
| and results in the image appearing full on utopic/vivid, even though
| a mount and df show only 74% full.
Note, that :
'df' reports the fs is 74% full,
dumpe2fs reports the filesystem is 358400 blocks,
resize2fs -P reports that the minimum size is 358400 blocks.
Ie, per resize2fs -P says we can't shrink this 1400M filesystem at all, which has greater than 300M available.
I'm willing to accept that this is academic, and an invalid bug, but I just wanted to clarify as the above seems wrong.
Ted, thanks for your response, and sorry for the spam.
Can you just verify that this specific bit seems correct:
| On that derived image, I see 'resize2fs -P' numbers like:
| trusty: 274500
| utopic: 358400
| vivid: 358400
| The 83900 blocks out of a 358400 seems significant (23% of the fs size),
| and results in the image appearing full on utopic/vivid, even though
| a mount and df show only 74% full.
Note, that :
'df' reports the fs is 74% full,
dumpe2fs reports the filesystem is 358400 blocks,
resize2fs -P reports that the minimum size is 358400 blocks.
Ie, per resize2fs -P says we can't shrink this 1400M filesystem at all, which has greater than 300M available.
I'm willing to accept that this is academic, and an invalid bug, but I just wanted to clarify as the above seems wrong.