I do not want to use up a blank BD-R for growisofs experiments
(selfish as i am).
So the open question is whether this tiny patch prevents the
inappropriate attempt to execute that CLOSE SESSION command:
Maybe some Ubuntu expert can convert the patch into an end-user-ready
Ubuntu thingy and maybe some end-user is willing to give it a try
when the next BD-R is about to be written.
Hi,
after re-reading this diagnosis of the problem by the lists.debian. org/cdwrite/ 2008/07/ msg00092. html lists.alioth. debian. org/pipermail/ debburn- devel/2013- June/000924. html
author of growisofs
http://
i developed a theory.
For details see
http://
I do not want to use up a blank BD-R for growisofs experiments
(selfish as i am).
So the open question is whether this tiny patch prevents the
inappropriate attempt to execute that CLOSE SESSION command:
--- growisofs_ mmc_orig. cpp 2013-06-14 19:53:51.000000000 +0200
+++ growisofs_mmc.cpp 2013-06-14 19:55:25.000000000 +0200
@@ -756,6 +756,8 @@ static void bd_r_format (Scsi_Command &c
wait_for_unit (cmd);
+ bdr_plus_pow = 1; transport( );
+
cmd[0] = 0x35; // FLUSH CACHE
cmd[9] = 0;
cmd.
Maybe some Ubuntu expert can convert the patch into an end-user-ready
Ubuntu thingy and maybe some end-user is willing to give it a try
when the next BD-R is about to be written.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas