was problematic. By dropping the (>=4.0) you are just allowing older versions of the package to satisfy the dependency, and we are not interested in that.
2. From a quick test, looks like we actually need that explicit
libssl-dev
build-depends you added. Do you have an idea on how it was building before, without that? If you don't, don't dig too much.
Some questions on:
- libtins4.0 (>=4.0),
- libtins-dev (>=4.0),
+ libtins-dev,
+ libssl-dev,
I don't think the versioned build depends
libtins-dev (>=4.0),
was problematic. By dropping the (>=4.0) you are just allowing older versions of the package to satisfy the dependency, and we are not interested in that.
2. From a quick test, looks like we actually need that explicit
libssl-dev
build-depends you added. Do you have an idea on how it was building before, without that? If you don't, don't dig too much.