Comment 11 for bug 1823836
Revision history for this message
| bugproxy (bugproxy) wrote Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla | #11 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2019-04-11 12:22 EDT-------
----- Comment From paelzer 2019-04-11 12:22:31 UTC-------
> Sorry for the off topic post, lets keep the bug to the error you reported.
> I'll probably start a discussion for the general PPC64-DPDK status via mail
> and keep you and others I know being involved in the loop.
The fact that we started to try out Ubuntu 19.04 must be illustrative of our commitments. There have been enough discussions out ppc64 support on the mailing list. Let us not allow that to cloud this discussion. Can we agree to limit the discussion to this bug?
Based on Dave's debug, there doesn't appear to be anything that is architecture specific. We have run a number of tests with DPDK-18.11 with and without MLNX_OFED on ppc64le without any issues.
The current situation is that we have access to P9, but not x86. On the other hand, you are likely to have access to x86 with CX-5. To narrow down this problem, can you see if this can be recreated on x86?
The underlying assumption is that all the relevant package versions between x86 and ppc64le are identical. Is that assumption correct?