Comment 35 for bug 216398

Revision history for this message
Pablo Castellano (pablocastellano) wrote :

Hello Malte.
The problem is that in Jaunty it has been already commited the patch with 90-*.
But renaming it to 30-* sounds very logical (reading sysctl.d/README). It was firstly named 90-* to be one of the last configurations executed.
I don't know what to do :?