Comment 6 for bug 191557

Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Luke did some analysis on the packages and found that it is still too immature to be supportable. For example, there is no notification at all when a component of the RAID gets defective, and it is not possible to rebuild a degraded array with the current packages.

Rejecting for hardy. This should be reconsidered for Hardy+1 once the packages get more mature and usable.