When ESM is enabled and the ESM archive is accessible - that location should be publishing Supported: field imho. And that field should be updated to match the ESM reality.
Cause it was my understanding that current ESM is a subset of regular LTS support. At least for precise, it is my understanding that the scope of supported architectures and packages is different.
I'm not sure where/how the look-aside information w.r.t. ESM can be published for those that do not have ESM enabled.
When ESM is enabled and the ESM archive is accessible - that location should be publishing Supported: field imho. And that field should be updated to match the ESM reality.
Cause it was my understanding that current ESM is a subset of regular LTS support. At least for precise, it is my understanding that the scope of supported architectures and packages is different.
I'm not sure where/how the look-aside information w.r.t. ESM can be published for those that do not have ESM enabled.