I'm working on getting the apply button working before uploading a test
version.
displayconfig-gtk is probably going to still be needed for non-xrandr
enabled drivers, and probably also for bulletproof-x mode. But
otherwise, that's correct that for xrandr-enabled drivers,
displayconfig-gtk will not be required.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:09:46AM -0000, unggnu wrote:
> It looks great. I would appreciate this. Is there a version for testing purposes?
> Btw. is displaconfig-gtk needed anymore with xorg.conf free configuration? I am not sure if all graphic/monitor configuration work with autodedection and xrandr but maybe it could be a fall back option which could be installed.
>
> --
> displayconfig-gtk should generate an randr 1.2 configuration where possible
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144641
> You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee.
>
> Status in Source Package "displayconfig-gtk" in Ubuntu: In Progress
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: displayconfig-gtk
>
> Where possible, displayconfig-gtk should generate an xorg.conf file that uses RandR 1.2 rather than the older xinerama server code, as it makes better use of the card's features (e.g. sharing a single framebuffer for multiple monitors), and allows runtime reconfiguration of the displays.
>
> There is some information on configuring an initial RandR 1.2 layout available on the Intel Linux Graphics website:
>
> http://www.intellinuxgraphics.org/dualhead.html
>
> The instructions there worked when configuring dual head on my Radeon 9200SE, modulo different naming of the outputs. To configure the "DVI-0" and "VGA-0" outputs on my system, I used the following configuration fragment:
>
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 SE]"
> Driver "ati"
> BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
> Option "monitor-DVI-0" "Sony SDM-S74 [1]"
> Option "monitor-VGA-0" "Sony SDM-S74 [2]"
> EndSection
>
> Section "Monitor"
> Identifier "Sony SDM-S74 [1]"
> Option "DPMS"
> HorizSync 30-65
> VertRefresh 50-75
> Option "LeftOf" "Sony SDM-S74 [2]"
> EndSection
>
> Section "Monitor"
> Identifier "Sony SDM-S74 [2]"
> Option "DPMS"
> HorizSync 30-65
> VertRefresh 50-75
> EndSection
>
> Section "Screen"
> Identifier "Default Screen"
> Device "ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 SE]"
> Monitor "Sony SDM-S74 [1]"
> DefaultDepth 16
> SubSection "Display"
> Modes "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
> Virtual 2560 1024
> EndSubSection
> EndSection
>
> One quirk I noticed was that I could not specify the position of the VGA-0 monitor relative to the DVI-0 monitor -- I needed to do the opposite. From a look at the "xrandr" command line tool output, this is probably because the VGA-0 output is the first one, and they set up the outputs in order so it doesn't know how to process the positioning option.
I'm working on getting the apply button working before uploading a test
version.
displayconfig-gtk is probably going to still be needed for non-xrandr
enabled drivers, and probably also for bulletproof-x mode. But
otherwise, that's correct that for xrandr-enabled drivers,
displayconfig-gtk will not be required.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:09:46AM -0000, unggnu wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 144641 www.intellinuxg raphics. org/dualhead. html
> It looks great. I would appreciate this. Is there a version for testing purposes?
> Btw. is displaconfig-gtk needed anymore with xorg.conf free configuration? I am not sure if all graphic/monitor configuration work with autodedection and xrandr but maybe it could be a fall back option which could be installed.
>
> --
> displayconfig-gtk should generate an randr 1.2 configuration where possible
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee.
>
> Status in Source Package "displayconfig-gtk" in Ubuntu: In Progress
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: displayconfig-gtk
>
> Where possible, displayconfig-gtk should generate an xorg.conf file that uses RandR 1.2 rather than the older xinerama server code, as it makes better use of the card's features (e.g. sharing a single framebuffer for multiple monitors), and allows runtime reconfiguration of the displays.
>
> There is some information on configuring an initial RandR 1.2 layout available on the Intel Linux Graphics website:
>
> http://
>
> The instructions there worked when configuring dual head on my Radeon 9200SE, modulo different naming of the outputs. To configure the "DVI-0" and "VGA-0" outputs on my system, I used the following configuration fragment:
>
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 SE]"
> Driver "ati"
> BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
> Option "monitor-DVI-0" "Sony SDM-S74 [1]"
> Option "monitor-VGA-0" "Sony SDM-S74 [2]"
> EndSection
>
> Section "Monitor"
> Identifier "Sony SDM-S74 [1]"
> Option "DPMS"
> HorizSync 30-65
> VertRefresh 50-75
> Option "LeftOf" "Sony SDM-S74 [2]"
> EndSection
>
> Section "Monitor"
> Identifier "Sony SDM-S74 [2]"
> Option "DPMS"
> HorizSync 30-65
> VertRefresh 50-75
> EndSection
>
> Section "Screen"
> Identifier "Default Screen"
> Device "ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 SE]"
> Monitor "Sony SDM-S74 [1]"
> DefaultDepth 16
> SubSection "Display"
> Modes "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
> Virtual 2560 1024
> EndSubSection
> EndSection
>
> One quirk I noticed was that I could not specify the position of the VGA-0 monitor relative to the DVI-0 monitor -- I needed to do the opposite. From a look at the "xrandr" command line tool output, this is probably because the VGA-0 output is the first one, and they set up the outputs in order so it doesn't know how to process the positioning option.