Please remove digikam from NBS architectures

[Jeremy Bícha]

digikam is now intentionally not built on ppc64el riscv64 s390x

See See https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/digikam/4:8.4.0-3 for the changelog justification

Therefore, please remove it on those architectures. It appears that process-removals does not automatically handle arch-specific removals from Debian.

$ reverse-depends src:digikam
Reverse-Recommends
==================
* multimedia-photography
* ubuntustudio-photography [amd64 arm64 armhf ppc64el]

$ reverse-depends -b src:digikam
No reverse dependencies found

[Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer)]

Thanks for linking to the changelog, indeed intentional and controlled.

Gladly those metapackage dependencies are only recommends.
But will they be cleaned up one day?
Probably not too important, certainly not to block on.

Ack to the case.

Removing packages from oracular:
 digikam 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular ppc64el
 digikam 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular riscv64
 digikam 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular s390x
 digikam-private-libs 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular ppc64el
 digikam-private-libs 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular riscv64
 digikam-private-libs 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular s390x
 showfoto 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular ppc64el
 showfoto 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular riscv64
 showfoto 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular s390x
Comment: Qt webengine is now mandatory, restricting architectures (LP: #2078273)
Remove [y|N]? y
9 packages successfully removed.

[Jeremy Bícha (jbicha)]

I'm adding a task for ubuntustudio-meta to update the digikam architectures.

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

This bug was fixed in the package ubuntustudio-meta - 24.10.13

---------------
ubuntustudio-meta (24.10.13) oracular; urgency=medium

  * Refreshed dependencies
  * Removed digikam from photography-recommends [ppc64el] (LP: #2078273)

 -- Erich Eickmeyer <email address hidden> Tue, 03 Sep 2024 07:34:39 -0700