This is fun – I built a sid and a precise chroot today, i386,
and built mksh against dietlibc-dev_0.33~cvs20110918-4_i386.deb
from Debian sid (dpkg -i’d on precise). It segfaults only on
Ubuntu, not on Debian. It is _not_ -fstack-protector-all.
Investigating. May be some gcc default flags difference…
Matthias, if you have an idea already, shoot.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
<ch> you introduced a merge commit │<mika> % g rebase -i HEAD^^
<mika> sorry, no idea and rebasing just fscked │<mika> Segmentation
<ch> should have cloned into a clean repo │ fault (core dumped)
<ch> if I rebase that now, it's really ugh │<mika:#grml> wuahhhhhh
Matthias Klose dixit:
>0.33~cvs20110710-2 still ftbfs
This is fun – I built a sid and a precise chroot today, i386, dev_0.33~ cvs20110918- 4_i386. deb protector- all.
and built mksh against dietlibc-
from Debian sid (dpkg -i’d on precise). It segfaults only on
Ubuntu, not on Debian. It is _not_ -fstack-
Investigating. May be some gcc default flags difference…
Matthias, if you have an idea already, shoot.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
<ch> you introduced a merge commit │<mika> % g rebase -i HEAD^^
<mika> sorry, no idea and rebasing just fscked │<mika> Segmentation
<ch> should have cloned into a clean repo │ fault (core dumped)
<ch> if I rebase that now, it's really ugh │<mika:#grml> wuahhhhhh