> You're right - it was technically still mounted (per 'mount') but /proc was empty. Ie, 'ls -l /proc' returns an empty directory.
That sounds seriously wrong. What is the exact output of "mount" and "cat /proc/mounts" when this happens?
> You're right - it was technically still mounted (per 'mount') but /proc was empty. Ie, 'ls -l /proc' returns an empty directory.
That sounds seriously wrong. What is the exact output of "mount" and "cat /proc/mounts" when this happens?