>> Here, again, we are at a point were the debiandoc-sgml maintainers need
>> to decide (perhaps you have, but I don't know yet):
>>
>> Do you want to produce PDF files only with pdflatex, or is there a
>> reason to create them via latex/dvips/ps2pdf?
>
> PDF files are not created using latex/dvips/ps2pdf! (See again #321942.)
So why not simply drop hyperref at all in this case?
>> If yes, you should use CJKbookmarks also for DVI files, as indicated
>> above. If not (and I recommend that), simply do not load hyperref at
>> all when producing dvi (unless you want to distribute DVI files, too).
>
> Since our packages FTBFS all the time it may be a good idea to add an
> option to debiandoc2latex to specify the further processing.
Jens Seidel <email address hidden> wrote:
>> Here, again, we are at a point were the debiandoc-sgml maintainers need
>> to decide (perhaps you have, but I don't know yet):
>>
>> Do you want to produce PDF files only with pdflatex, or is there a
>> reason to create them via latex/dvips/ps2pdf?
>
> PDF files are not created using latex/dvips/ps2pdf! (See again #321942.)
So why not simply drop hyperref at all in this case?
>> If yes, you should use CJKbookmarks also for DVI files, as indicated
>> above. If not (and I recommend that), simply do not load hyperref at
>> all when producing dvi (unless you want to distribute DVI files, too).
>
> Since our packages FTBFS all the time it may be a good idea to add an
> option to debiandoc2latex to specify the further processing.
Why do you think you need this? Isn't
\ifpdf colorlinks= true,CJKbookmar ks]{hyperref}
\usepackage[
\fi
enough? This will ignore hyperref completely for dvi generation, and
thus for ps generation.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer