So it would need 2 addition to the i386 whitelist.
Feel free to bring an archive administrator in the loop, I think it's only
them who have the power to do that (if we want to go through that route).
Except that I just realized that rpm (and debugedit) in focal are in
universe. So it would also need a MIR, which is definitely not happening
for a stable release.
I also guess that's the reason debugedit was split off rpm.
So I suppose we either need to check whether backporting debugedit would
make it build on i386, or revert that change in debhelper.
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022, 1:31 pm David Ward, <email address hidden> wrote:
So it would need 2 addition to the i386 whitelist.
Feel free to bring an archive administrator in the loop, I think it's only
them who have the power to do that (if we want to go through that route).
Except that I just realized that rpm (and debugedit) in focal are in
universe. So it would also need a MIR, which is definitely not happening
for a stable release.
I also guess that's the reason debugedit was split off rpm.
So I suppose we either need to check whether backporting debugedit would
make it build on i386, or revert that change in debhelper.
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022, 1:31 pm David Ward, <email address hidden> wrote:
> I am able to build src:rpm for focal i386 using pbuilder, as long as /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1965800 /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ debhelper/ +bug/1965800/ +subscriptions /lists. ubuntu. com/mailman/ listinfo/ ubuntu- backports
> p7zip-full:i386 is built first.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
> Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building
> (missing dependency)
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https:/
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-backports mailing list
> <email address hidden>
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https:/
>