Comment 4 for bug 1633520

Thanks Jamie, I've added snapd to this bug. Given that it's blocking me, I happily volunteer to work on it.

Just please confirm that my understanding is correct: it will be a new interface, whose slot will be implemented in snapd itself, and snaps willing to use the auto-activation feature will have to declare a plug with a parameter describing the service file to be installed (the name of the service can be found inside the .service file). Is this correct?