On Jan 20, 2012, at 07:39 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>On Friday, January 20, 2012 07:18:20 PM you wrote:
>> >https://launchpad.net/~novacut/+archive/daily/+build/3106062
>> >
>> >https://launchpad.net/~novacut/+archive/daily/+build/3106063
>>
>> Yep, these are known, and actually caused by some buggy packaging of
>> dbus. In order to move the dbus binaries to /bin from /usr/bin, an
>> unfortunate bug crept into the packaging. The debug version of dbus-launch
>> ends up in the production deb.
>
>That looks like it might be SRU worthy.
I'm open to that. I don't think it's a critical problem since in practice
that environment variable won't usually be set. OTOH, it should be a totally
safe change.
On Jan 20, 2012, at 07:39 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>On Friday, January 20, 2012 07:18:20 PM you wrote: /launchpad. net/~novacut/ +archive/ daily/+ build/3106062 /launchpad. net/~novacut/ +archive/ daily/+ build/3106063
>> >https:/
>> >
>> >https:/
>>
>> Yep, these are known, and actually caused by some buggy packaging of
>> dbus. In order to move the dbus binaries to /bin from /usr/bin, an
>> unfortunate bug crept into the packaging. The debug version of dbus-launch
>> ends up in the production deb.
>
>That looks like it might be SRU worthy.
I'm open to that. I don't think it's a critical problem since in practice
that environment variable won't usually be set. OTOH, it should be a totally
safe change.